Joseph Burns
Contributing Editor

For-profit insurers will evolve by developing lines of business beyond health insurance, predicts Wendell Potter, an author and former insurance company communications executive.

“I don’t see insurers going out of business,” says Potter, the author of Deadly Spin, An Insurance Company Insider Speaks Out on How Corporate PR Is Killing Health Care and Deceiving Americans (Bloomsbury Press, 2010). “Instead, health insurers will be radically different and some will still be around. The smaller ones will be absorbed or they will consolidate and grow stronger.

“The for-profit companies need to evolve because the shareholders and Wall Street analysts will demand that they continue to show increased profit each quarter,” he explains. “That’s why they have to evolve and why they will cede some of the health insurance market for basic medical coverage to smaller not-for-profit companies or to Blue Cross plans.

“Investors and analysts will look very closely at the limits the Affordable Care Act imposed on the medical loss ratio (MLR), which means insurers can no longer do what they’ve done to make the profit margins they made in the past. Wall Street analysts will want them to focus their attention on more profitable areas of business.

“By law, public companies have to serve their shareholders first, and that obligation competes with their obligation to serve patients,” he says. “Therefore, insurers are changing their business model by narrowing the universe of customers they serve. You can’t keep doing that and continue to stay in business.”

In addition to limits on MLR, the ACA forces insurers to face increased competition in the exchanges.

Wall Street analysts will want [health plans] to focus their attention on more profitable areas of business.

“Insurers have never had to compete with other insurers on exchanges before,” Potter observes. “That’s why they’re beefing up their presence in the Medicare Advantage and Medicaid markets when they can. That’s also why they prefer to work with self-insured companies, and why they are leaving the individual and small business markets to the Blue Cross plans.”

One asset that health plans have that others need is data on their members, data that a variety of parties may find useful, Potter says. “The for-profit companies will diversify to become data companies,” he adds. “It will be interesting to see who they sell that data to because, in some cases, they will sell to competitors and to providers. Some insurers already market their data to others because they recognize that what they have has value for their corporate customers and for not-for-profit insurers.

“Watching these companies over the next few years will be interesting as they evolve to serve their shareholders and analysts,” he concludes. “And, by 2014, the changes they are making now will accelerate.”

Wendell Potter

Health Plan 2020


Managed Care’s Top Ten Articles of 2016

There’s a lot more going on in health care than mergers (Aetna-Humana, Anthem-Cigna) creating huge players. Hundreds of insurers operate in 50 different states. Self-insured employers, ACA public exchanges, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid managed care plans crowd an increasingly complex market.

Major health care players are determined to make health information exchanges (HIEs) work. The push toward value-based payment alone almost guarantees that HIEs will be tweaked, poked, prodded, and overhauled until they deliver on their promise. The goal: straight talk from and among tech systems.

They bring a different mindset. They’re willing to work in teams and focus on the sort of evidence-based medicine that can guide health care’s transformation into a system based on value. One question: How well will this new generation of data-driven MDs deal with patients?

The surge of new MS treatments have been for the relapsing-remitting form of the disease. There’s hope for sufferers of a different form of MS. By homing in on CD20-positive B cells, ocrelizumab is able to knock them out and other aberrant B cells circulating in the bloodstream.

A flood of tests have insurers ramping up prior authorization and utilization review. Information overload is a problem. As doctors struggle to keep up, health plans need to get ahead of the development of the technology in order to successfully manage genetic testing appropriately.

Having the data is one thing. Knowing how to use it is another. Applying its computational power to the data, a company called RowdMap puts providers into high-, medium-, and low-value buckets compared with peers in their markets, using specific benchmarks to show why outliers differ from the norm.
Competition among manufacturers, industry consolidation, and capitalization on me-too drugs are cranking up generic and branded drug prices. This increase has compelled PBMs, health plan sponsors, and retail pharmacies to find novel ways to turn a profit, often at the expense of the consumer.
The development of recombinant DNA and other technologies has added a new dimension to care. These medications have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many of the other 80 or so autoimmune diseases. But they can be budget busters and have a tricky side effect profile.

Shelley Slade
Vogel, Slade & Goldstein

Hub programs have emerged as a profitable new line of business in the sales and distribution side of the pharmaceutical industry that has got more than its fair share of wheeling and dealing. But they spell trouble if they spark collusion, threaten patients, or waste federal dollars.

More companies are self-insuring—and it’s not just large employers that are striking out on their own. The percentage of employers who fully self-insure increased by 44% in 1999 to 63% in 2015. Self-insurance may give employers more control over benefit packages, and stop-loss protects them against uncapped liability.