John La Puma, MD
Mark Palmer

Insurers can play an active part in helping members change their thinking, and therefore change their lifestyles

John La Puma, MD

Mark Palmer

Weight-loss programs have dismal success rates. Eleven pounds is the average weight lost after a year in a counseling-based weight-loss program. After two years, 83 percent of participants have gained back more than they lost. Complete regain is the norm after five years.

Most people are better off not going on diets at all.

What is missing is not just an individualized method of sustainable weight loss for health plan members. Health plans' customers are missing out on reduced presenteeism, reduced absenteeism, and reduced short-term and long-term disability claims.

The National Business Group on Health estimates that obesity accounts for 39 million lost work days, 239 million restricted-activity days, and 63 million physician visits. Health insurance costs related to obesity are $8 billion of the $13 billion that obesity costs U.S. companies annually.

But obesity is a personal medical problem suffered by an individual, and the only person who can solve the problem is the individual. While the financial impact of obesity is felt at the health plan level, obesity cannot be solved at the health plan level.

But there is something the health plan can do: Support success. If a health plan's weight loss program focuses on helping employees change their thinking, not just what they eat, it helps them today and it gives them a tool for tomorrow.

There are two keys to individualized, sustainable weight loss. The first is qualification: Not everyone qualifies as someone who sincerely desires to lose weight and to prevent regain. Qualified plan members are ready to change their thinking, motivated to begin a lifestyle change (not a diet), and available to do so.

The second key is a health plan actively engaged in helping qualified members, and educating plan members not yet ready for sustainable weight loss.

Sustainable weight loss is not about dieting, though dieting is the usual strategy of weight- loss programs. It is about consistency: consistency about what, with whom, how, and when you eat; consistent exercise; and consistent care of your body.

Each person's goals, family, and schedule are the keys to success. So is the skill of those people who have kept weight off for years, such as those in the National Weight Control Registry.

Though using these ideas is logical, it takes a health plan tired of seeing its money wasted on usual and customary approaches to try them. It takes willingness to create a supportive environment and to use technology to expand the program's reach within an organization.

Most of all, it takes a company that believes that the time to begin addressing obesity is now.

What does your company believe?

John La Puma, M.D. has had an estimated 5,500 patient visits on weight loss plans, strategies, tactics and recipes. He is the New York Times bestselling author of The RealAge Diet and Cooking the RealAge Way, with Michael Roizen, MD.
Mark Palmer is CEO of «MyOwnWeightLoss.com» and a successful patient in Dr. La Puma's weight-loss program. He has lost 50 pounds and kept it off.

Contact: info@myownweightloss.com

Contact info:
John La Puma, MD
Director
Chef Clinic
2417 Castillo St.
Suite F
Santa Barbara, CA 93105

Managed Care’s Top Ten Articles of 2016

There’s a lot more going on in health care than mergers (Aetna-Humana, Anthem-Cigna) creating huge players. Hundreds of insurers operate in 50 different states. Self-insured employers, ACA public exchanges, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid managed care plans crowd an increasingly complex market.

Major health care players are determined to make health information exchanges (HIEs) work. The push toward value-based payment alone almost guarantees that HIEs will be tweaked, poked, prodded, and overhauled until they deliver on their promise. The goal: straight talk from and among tech systems.

They bring a different mindset. They’re willing to work in teams and focus on the sort of evidence-based medicine that can guide health care’s transformation into a system based on value. One question: How well will this new generation of data-driven MDs deal with patients?

The surge of new MS treatments have been for the relapsing-remitting form of the disease. There’s hope for sufferers of a different form of MS. By homing in on CD20-positive B cells, ocrelizumab is able to knock them out and other aberrant B cells circulating in the bloodstream.

A flood of tests have insurers ramping up prior authorization and utilization review. Information overload is a problem. As doctors struggle to keep up, health plans need to get ahead of the development of the technology in order to successfully manage genetic testing appropriately.

Having the data is one thing. Knowing how to use it is another. Applying its computational power to the data, a company called RowdMap puts providers into high-, medium-, and low-value buckets compared with peers in their markets, using specific benchmarks to show why outliers differ from the norm.
Competition among manufacturers, industry consolidation, and capitalization on me-too drugs are cranking up generic and branded drug prices. This increase has compelled PBMs, health plan sponsors, and retail pharmacies to find novel ways to turn a profit, often at the expense of the consumer.
The development of recombinant DNA and other technologies has added a new dimension to care. These medications have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many of the other 80 or so autoimmune diseases. But they can be budget busters and have a tricky side effect profile.

Shelley Slade
Vogel, Slade & Goldstein

Hub programs have emerged as a profitable new line of business in the sales and distribution side of the pharmaceutical industry that has got more than its fair share of wheeling and dealing. But they spell trouble if they spark collusion, threaten patients, or waste federal dollars.

More companies are self-insuring—and it’s not just large employers that are striking out on their own. The percentage of employers who fully self-insure increased by 44% in 1999 to 63% in 2015. Self-insurance may give employers more control over benefit packages, and stop-loss protects them against uncapped liability.