Managed Care


Physicians oppose public disclosure of quality

MANAGED CARE April 2007. © MediMedia USA
Compensation Monitor

Physicians oppose public disclosure of quality

MANAGED CARE April 2007. ©MediMedia USA

Although 3 out of 4 primary care physicians support the use of financial rewards as an incentive for better medical care, the majority would rather not make quality assessments readily available to the public, according to a recent survey by the University of Chicago Medical Center. Physicians in the survey view public reporting as potentially punitive, and they worry that such programs may harm poor and noncompliant patients.

"We found a sizeable reservoir of potential physician support, in principle, for financial incentives to improve care," says the author, Lawrence Casalino, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of health studies, "but we also found a good deal of mistrust and concern about how such incentives would be assessed and applied and about how the applications might alter access to care for high-risk or disadvantaged patients."

Respondents also expressed a pervasive lack of confidence in how well quality of care can be assessed. Eighty-five percent questioned the accuracy of current tools for risk adjustment. But in fact, more than half rejected public reporting on quality of medical groups and individual doctors even if it is accurate.

Casalino reports that 82 percent worried that flawed quality assessments would encourage physicians to avoid high-risk patients. One physician respondent said that the "poor, unmotivated, obese, and noncompliant would all have to find new physicians."

Only 38 percent agreed strongly or somewhat strongly that "health plans will try hard to make quality measures as accurate as possible." And only 35 percent agreed strongly or somewhat strongly that the government would try hard.

Physicians should be given financial incentives for quality

Financial incentives for quality are unprofessional

Measures of the quality of individual physicians' performance should be made public

Measures of the quality of individual medical groups' performance should be made public

Source: Casalino LP, et al. General internists' views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: A national survey. Health Affairs. 2007;26(2):492–499.


2014 Annual HEDIS® and Star Ratings Symposium Nashville, TN November 3–4, 2014
PCMH & Shared Savings ACO Leadership Summit Nashville, TN November 3–4, 2014
Medicare Risk Adjustment, Revenue Management, & Star Ratings Fort Lauderdale, FL November 12–14, 2014
World Orphan Drug Congress Europe 2014 Brussels, Belgium November 12–14, 2014
Healthcare Chief Medical Officer Forum Alexandria, VA November 13–14, 2014
Home Care Leadership Summit Atlanta, GA November 17–18, 2014
6th Semi-Annual Diagnostic Coverage and Reimbursement Conference Boston December 4–5, 2014
Customer Analytics & Engagement in Health Insurance Chicago December 4–5, 2014
Pharmaceutical and Biotech Clinical Quality Assurance Conference Alexandria, VA December 4–5, 2014
9th Semi-Annual Medical Device Coverage and Reimbursement Conference San Diego December 5, 2014
8th Annual Medical Device Clinical Trials Conference Chicago December 8–9, 2014
HealthIMPACT Southeast Tampa, FL January 23, 2015